Mergers & Acquisitions

 View Only
  • 1.  Types of M&A with the Change Structure

    Posted 2024-05-02 14:07

    With all of the collective wisdom here , I am seeking to find something related to M&A for change. Especially if there is anything that I can learn from related to the type(s) of M&A and change guidance/structure to apply; not methodologies like ADKAR, Kotter, etc.. I am thinking of how to assess and align CM to the various types of M&A attributes. 

    Do you have something like that or know another resource that you trust? Thank you for sharing any wisdom you have on this.

    Cheers,
    Douglas



    ------------------------------
    Douglas Flory
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Types of M&A with the Change Structure

    Posted 2024-05-03 08:17

    Doug, can you clarify what you mean when you say types of M&A attributes? 



    ------------------------------
    Jennifer Thompson
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Types of M&A with the Change Structure

    Posted 2024-05-04 02:06
    Edited by Robert Snyder 2024-05-04 02:08

    Hi Doug. In the spirit of Change/Expectation/Perception Management, my ideas for you leaned into two things ...

    1. Impacts on profitability (discipline of a merger)
    2. Being upfront about what might be unpopular (so minimizing downside) (empathy of a merger)

    So, note that I disregarded ideas to maximize the upside of the event.

    I broke down profitability into revenue and costs.

    1. Revenue = Price x Quantity. Often, the resulting entity has more market power so can raise price. So, Price is worth including in your analysis. Customers will care about that.
    2. Costs = FC + MC. The generic expectation of a merger is that the decision reduces ongoing costs, which suggests discontinuing certain operations. So, Discontinue Operations is worth including in your analysis. Upstream and downstream actors in your value chain will care about that.
    3. A third unpopular activity that comes to mind is documenting Current State. I consider it a healthy prerequisite for the previous concept of Discontinuing Operations. Your employees will grumble about this.
    4. Since certain operational metrics are inevitably expected to change, that begs for a Scorecard that includes leading and lagging metrics expected to change. A forward-looking scorecard could show expected pace of change of certain metrics over X months. For leading metrics, a scorecard could show aggressive and conservative targets. For lagging metrics, a scorecard could show optimistic and pessimistic targets.

    You mention different types of M&A, and I admit I can't speak to that.

    Could this type of table help shake out more ideas for what you're looking for?

    M&A Attribute |

    Change in internal metric

    Impacted Stakeholder Group

    ??

    Increase price

    Customers

    Merge/discontinue operations

    Value Chain partners upstream & downstream

    Document Current State

    Employees



    ------------------------------
    Robert Snyder
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Types of M&A with the Change Structure

    Posted 2024-05-05 13:13

    Thank you Robert for sharing . 



    ------------------------------
    Douglas Flory
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Types of M&A with the Change Structure

    Posted 2024-05-13 15:37

    Doug, 

    Did you get what you hoped for from your post? If not, share a bit more detail about what you are seeking. 



    ------------------------------
    Leslie Ellis
    leslie@meaningfulchangeconsulting.com
    Founder & CEO
    Meaningful Change Consulting, LLC
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Types of M&A with the Change Structure

    Posted 2024-05-06 09:42

    This is great! Thank you for sharing! 



    ------------------------------
    Tammie Ray
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Types of M&A with the Change Structure

    Posted 2024-05-06 09:42

    Thank you for raising the question. Great feedback you have received. 



    ------------------------------
    Tammie Ray
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: Types of M&A with the Change Structure

    Posted 2024-05-21 09:41

    Doug,

    I have been following this conversation for a while now and thought I might offer a slightly different point of view from a much higher (50,000 foot) perspective.

    As president of a global company, we broke our acquisition targets into three over-arching categories - Strategic, Operational, and Financial, each raising different structure questions and requiring different integration approaches.

    Strategic acquisitions focused on expanding/integrating/leveraging the strategies of the two companies.  This category generally required the highest level of integration as there was the possibility of one company absorbing the other.  If not in totality, at least at the product or brand level, and providing one face to the customer.

    Operational acquisitions required less integration.  The intent here is to bring the acquiring company's operational expertise to bear on the target to improve its performance.  This typically requires a philosophical and somewhat cultural integration with lots of external operational excellence support.

    Financial acquisitions required the least integration.  Think Berkshire Hathaway.  We love what you do, how you do it, and who you are.  Keep doing what you are doing and send us the checks!   This type of integration typically only requires financial systems integration.

    Hope this helps.



    ------------------------------
    Anthony Casablanca
    Co-Founder and President
    GriefLeaders LLC
    "Changing How Change is Implemented"
    www.griefleaders.com
    ]
    ------------------------------