Mergers & Acquisitions

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

  • 1.  Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

    Posted 2025-02-10 11:23

    Hi everyone,

    I am working with a client to develop an integration playbook for their company. As a consultant, most of our tools/frameworks are in PPT since we facilitate discussions, and then some of the outputs are translated into other PPT or spreadsheets. I want to create something very tactical for them, that is practical; not a narrative-heavy, hundred-page document that we often see as "playbooks". Does anyone have any interesting formats that have worked well for them? Any tips on how to make this tool engaging?

    A big thank-you in advance!

    Gabrielle



    ------------------------------
    Gabrielle Maurice
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

    Posted 2025-02-11 14:38

    Hi Gabrielle, While I cannot share the content - I understand the complexity. In one situation we set up a Google Drive (can be any cloud space) and encouraged people to upload "one-pagers" - a team's summary of an integrated approach - eg, Resolving Duplicate Roles; Values Integration; Building Cross Functional Teams; Aligning Best Practices (in a specific arena, eg, compliance, lead generation, reporting). While broad, the approach created collaboration teams (some offered to be contacted for questions) and the one-pager format was very popular - which people could scan for ideas, adapt to their situation and contact the author(s) to gain insight as needed. 



    ------------------------------
    Lisa Jackson
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

    Posted 2025-02-16 12:54

    Lisa, I have done a similar approach with Microsoft Teams. 



    ------------------------------
    Tammie Ray
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

    Posted 2025-03-03 12:41

    I really like the one-pagers! Great idea. 



    ------------------------------
    Gabrielle Maurice
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

    Posted 2025-03-18 14:40

    Thank you for sharing! I would love an example or at least and idea of what the one-pager included for each - what content was collected and presented on the page? thanks! 



    ------------------------------
    Hillary Sybrowsky
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

    Posted 2025-03-27 15:51

    Hi Hillary, sorry for the delayed response. Our one-pagers focused on top "pain point" questions / topics.  A few included: 

    1) How will my team or job change? How and when?

    2) What happens if our team is merged into the acquiring company's team? 

    3) What do we tell customers who are asking about this merger?

    The content was built around the question - sometimes a broader version "What does merging two teams into one team look like?"

    Where possible we aim for anonymous surveys to develop the prompts that define the one-pager (which were either made into PDFs and emailed to team leaders, or hosted on a password protected web page).  Common question themes:

    --Why this merger makes sense. A short version of the purpose and leaders' hopeful synergies

    -- What RIF decisions will be made and by when.  This obviously cannot be answered with details, but we coached leaders to be transparent, IF true - there will likely be some impact to duplicate roles; that the organizations would provide plenty of runway and support to individuals, and as much as possible, ensure that any decision making engages the employee before there's a sudden "you're gone today." (which is tricky for all the reasons we know, but it has worked well to do this where roles are not highly confidential or at risk for sabotage.)  

    -- Will I receive severance and/or outplacement support if laid off?  Say what you can about what's true.

    -- If I am laid off, what about eligibility for rehire later? 

    The content was always constructed with the #1 criteria of "be honest but don't misinform."  and of course, often had to be run through the legal team. In my work with M&A, as a culture expert, I am usually trying to create communications that build bridges - eg, "Did You Know" content that highlights personal stories of leadership, "proud moments" from both companies. 

    Does that help to answer your question? 

    There are probably more, but that's the most common list.  What have you seen in your experience? 



    ------------------------------
    Lisa Jackson
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

    Posted 2025-02-11 15:19

    Hi, Gabrielle:

    I can help you with integration for the change management efforts, however, I have several questions to know what information to provide you.

    Does your client have an Integration Management Office (IMO)? Most companies establish this entity early in the due diligence process and the members of the IMO, which represent multiple business functions, develop the overall Integration playbook, with individual playbooks for each work stream, e.g., IT, HR, etc.

    Are you wanting to develop a playbook for the entire Integration (all work streams) or the change management role in the Integration? Because you should only be responsible for the change management work, e.g., OCM for the IT, HR or culture integrations.

    How big is the company you're working with? Where are they in the Integration process? Have they acquired a company/companies or are they just considering it?



    ------------------------------
    Diane Weinsheimer
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

    Posted 2025-02-16 12:53

    Diane, great questions to help determine framework. I like the IMO approach and not ownership of the overall results.



    ------------------------------
    Tammie Ray
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

    Posted 2025-03-03 12:41

    Hi Diane,

    Apologies for the delay. Great questions! They have about 1,000 employees in professional services, no IMO (but a dedicated, part-time PM for integrations). I have worked with him in supporting a few integrations that have already taken place, but mostly in a coaching/advisory role. We will be building the playbook for the entire integration process. This company is relatively immature in terms of taking robust approaches to transformations (they are very reactive, less planful). Any advice or insights would be greatly appreciated.

    Thank you,

    Gabrielle



    ------------------------------
    Gabrielle Maurice
    ------------------------------



  • 10.  RE: Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

    Posted 2025-02-13 14:13

    Hi Gabrielle,
    I would consider creating a living digital playbook, here is a link to an example of one created by the UK government. Also take a look at tools like Notion or Confluence for a dynamic, easily updated playbook with the ability to embed tools/ templates, video links etc.



    ------------------------------
    Marilyn Wamalwa
    ------------------------------



  • 11.  RE: Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

    Posted 2025-02-16 12:45

    Hi Marilyn - thank you for sharing the example. It was very clean and easy to follow. I will have to look at the applications you suggested. Thank you. 



    ------------------------------
    Tammie Ray
    ------------------------------



  • 12.  RE: Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

    Posted 2025-02-15 21:23

    When you say the term "tactical," I immediately think of verbs, percent complete, and a script.

      

    Idea 1 of 2 for you is the engagement piece – high-altitude.

    What is no longer engaging in 2025: values and principles. Too squishy, too difficult to detect unaligned contributors, and difficult to remove insincere stakeholders and keep only aligned and sincere stakeholders.

    What is engaging in 2025: metaphors. More tangible, easier to detect unaligned contributors, easier to manage, mentor, micro-mentor, or just remove unaligned stakeholders.

    • Metaphors for good teamwork: symphony, improv team, factory.
    • Metaphors for bad teamwork: traffic jam, bumper cars, whack-a-mole, and karaoke.

       

    • Values and principles are a "cul-de-sac" (yawn) point-of-view – not engaging.
    • Metaphors give you a pointy point-of-view – engaging.

    Imagine a team asking,

    • "What would a symphony do?" (synchronize, listen, blend, pace itself)
    • "What would an expectation factory do?" (set expectations, meet expectations, rinse, repeat)
    • "What would an improv team do?" (play Yes And, have each other's back)

    Or the snarky versions …

    • "What would a traffic jam do?" (bury the highways in moving vehicles)
    • "What would bumper cars do? (double and triple book their schedules)
    • "How would a two-year-old walk?" (aimlessly, but take delight in just staying on their feet)

    Idea 2 of 2 for you is the tactical piece – low altitude.

    What is not tactical: adjectives. RACI. Squishy. Ambiguous. Existed for many years. Not solving your problem (or anyone's biggest problems). Percent complete? No connection.

    What is noise, reinventing the wheel, and a team that is "all over the place?" What is the opposite of a playbook? A project plan with dozens of verbs. Jagged, lumpy, and STILL harboring tons of ambiguity. "Verb Sprawl."

    What is tactical: verbs that yearn for the label "100% complete." Verbs that are ruthlessly unambiguous about what qualifies as "productivity" in collaboration. Verbs that encourage muscle memory so that the team is no longer self-absorbed in mechanics and can elevate its brainpower to the collaboration space itself, the customer experience, and stakeholder empathy.

    The framework is Five Verbs (instead of RACI's Four Adjectives). It's tactical since …

    • It manages whatever work is worth the rigor of Five Verbs
    • It shrugs at managing whatever work is NOT worth the rigor of Five Verbs
    • It ruthlessly clarifies who is contributing, how, and when
    • it's explicit – not rigid – and you can always change your mind

    You cannot form a symphony out of whatever is infinite (meetings, emails, verbs)

    You can form a symphony out of two dimensions that are both finite (Five Verbs and whatever is worth Five Verbs), scalable, and smooth.

    Again, the two ideas for a tactical playbook are:

    • Three metaphors
    • Five Verbs

    You asked about some formats – please see attached.

    Work that doesn't fall under these is just a chat, that requires no keyboard, that no one will care about weeks or months from now.

    • Activity = meetings & emails.
    • Productivity = 100% on the Five Verbs.

    What might be engaging for a stakeholder who is skeptical of Five Verbs: steer the project plan HARD into Verb Sprawl (or bullet points forming a completely unsynchronized task list). Tell the skeptic,

    • "There's a time and place for your impressive vocabulary, and the project plan is that perfect place!" 😊 Instead of "smooth," this shapes a very lumpy, VUCA culture.
    • "I thought your work might be worth documenting, but you're right. You've convinced me. Your work is not worth keystrokes."
    • "AI scribing all of our meeting minutes! Why ... it's almost too good to be true! Imagine the library we'll build!"

    Ouch. And "Doh!" 😊 

    What could be more tactical – ruthlessly disciplined – than an "elegant expectation factory?"

    What could be more empathetic than a portfolio of documents that represent a company's collaborative advantage? Where the team demonstrated its IQ, EQ, and HQ (hospitality quotient). Where a high-trust team possesses high competence, honesty, dependability, and benevolence?

    Execution's two best friends are simplicity and transparency. This communication symphony gives you both.

    I welcome reactions, questions, ideas, pushback, concerns, etc.

    Let's convert traffic jams into symphonies.

    Let's convert frustration factories into elegant expectation factories.

    Let's solve VUCA.



    ------------------------------
    Robert Snyder
    ------------------------------



  • 13.  RE: Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

    Posted 2025-03-04 13:27

    Hi Gabrielle, As far as the format and presentation of playbooks, we moved all of our power point based playbooks over to a SharePoint format. This has made for a much better user experience for those needing to find information, and also from an admin perspective. Our "common" pages are now central documented and linked into each workstream-specific playbook so we know they're always consistent. Each workstream has edit access to update at any time as necessary, and the SharePoint functionality allows us to track and audit updates and annual reviews. Good luck!

    Becky



    ------------------------------
    Becky Persak
    Aon
    Head of M&A - Leadership, Culture & Change
    ------------------------------



  • 14.  RE: Developing a Custom Integration Playbook

    Posted 2025-03-27 15:53

    I really like the Sharepoint add, that's worked well in some of my projects as well.



    ------------------------------
    Lisa Jackson[
    ------------------------------